By their signatures below, the Parties respectfully consent to the execution of this Agreement.
2 “Individualized supports” are behavioral strategies designed for a particular child’s needs to help maintain appropriate behavior, and “individualized interventions” are behavioral strategies designed to support de-escalation for a particular child.
3 Private schools that enroll children who were placed or referred by public agencies, such as school districts, routinely develop, in conjunction with an IEP team, individualized, preventative supports and techniques to help children with Autism Spectrum Disorder mitigate or prevent negative behavior. Individualized behavioral strategies are commonly provided in the form of a written plan called a behavioral intervention plan (BIP). BIPs are informed by evaluations based on parental input and professional assessments referred to as Functional Behavioral Assessments (FBAs). FBAs analyze environmental factors, including any history of trauma that may contribute to a child’s inappropriate behaviors. Data obtained from the FBA is considered in the development of a BIP, from which staff can draw upon for examples of behavioral strategies that are effective for the specific child.
4 If the child does not have an IEP, Anova will convene its staff and invite the child’s parent(s) or guardian(s) to consider whether individualized supports and interventions are necessary as a reasonable modification pursuant to the ADA. If Anova believes the child may be IDEA eligible, it may notify the Local Educational Agency or State Educational Agency to consider the design and development of special education and related services. 34 C.F.R. § 300.134.
5 The fundamental alteration defense does not apply to Anova with respect to its routine reliance on restraint for behavior management because California’s State law prohibits any such reliance. Cal. Ed. Code, § 49005 (“Restraint and seclusion should only be used as a safety measure of last resort, and should never be used as punishment or discipline or for staff convenience”); Cal. Educ. Code, § 56521.1 (“Emergency interventions shall not be used as a substitute for the systematic behavioral intervention plan that is designed to change, replace, modify, or eliminate a targeted behavior.”). Other defenses under Title III of the ADA may apply, such as legitimate safety requirements or direct threat.
6 “Anova staff” refers to Anova educators, Anova behavior analysts or interventionists, Anova administrators and Anova staff members involved in the provision of individualized supports, interventions or restraint.
FOR ANOVA CENTER FOR EDUCATION:
/s/ Andrew Bailey
Andrew Bailey
CEO
Anova Center for Education
Contra Costa, CA
12/19/19
Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM
/s/ Tracy Tibbals
Tracy Tibbals
Counsel to Anova
Contra Costa, CA
12/19/19
Date
REBECCA B. BOND
Chief
Disability Rights Section
KATHLEEN P. WOLFE
Special Litigation Counsel
Disability Rights Section
ROBERTA KIRKENDALL
Special Legal Counsel
Disability Rights Section
KEVIN J. KIJEWSKI
Deputy Chief
Disability Rights Section
/s/ Charlotte Lanvers
CHARLOTTE LANVERS
ALYSE BASS
Trial Attorneys
Disability Rights Section
Civil Rights Division
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., (4CON)
Washington, D.C. 20530
Telephone: (202) 305-0706
charlotte.lanvers@usdoj.gov
1/9/20
Date